|
Users viewing this topic:
none
|
|
Login | |
|
RE: Revelation question - 3/7/2010 8:49:22 AM
|
|
|
Ntech
Posts: 62
Joined: 5/3/2005
Status: offline
|
Stormcrow, I would argue that the events of Matthew are set for a distant future time from Jesus Christ. Looking at Matthew 24 he sets a definative event to mark when the events of his prophecy is supposed to happen. Verse 14 when the gospel is preached to all the world. That event wasn't possible until the late 19th early 20th century. And I would pose that the rest of the prophecy following that point is supposed to happen after that point. Those events are not in sequence as far as I can tell but they do happen after the event of verse 14. The fall of Jerusalem in 70 AD was foretold in Luke 21. Matthew 24 verse 15 and Luke 21 verse 20 is not the same event. Matthew 24-15 is after the diaspora. Luke 21-20 puts his event before the diaspora.
|
|
|
|
RE: Revelation question - 3/7/2010 9:37:47 AM
|
|
|
Stormcrow
Posts: 587
Joined: 12/9/2007
Status: offline
|
Sorry, Ntech... Not buying your argument. The word says what it says. I have added nothing nor taken anything from it. If you find yourself in disagreement with it, please feel free to take it up with the one who spoke it. Furthermore, you're taking verse 14 out of context. In verse 14, He's wrapping up His summary on the signs of His coming: the things WE are to look for before His return. But then in verse 15, He starts talking about Jerusalem and tells the disciples the destruction of Jerusalem is NOT a sign of His coming. In fact, when He says people start saying, "Look, he's here!" after its destruction, He tells us specifically "DON'T FOLLOW THEM!" Why? Because there are many false prophets out there who would deceive them! quote:
Matthew 24 verse 15 and Luke 21 verse 20 is not the same event. Matthew 24-15 is after the diaspora. Luke 21-20 puts his event before the diaspora. Quite wrong. They are the same event. Read them again: each tells of the same event from different perspective. Luke interprets Matthew. They compliment each other. They don't contradict each other. The contradiction you're seeing is based on a false doctrine.
< Message edited by Stormcrow -- 3/7/2010 10:40:56 AM >
|
|
|
|
RE: Revelation question - 3/7/2010 10:27:22 AM
|
|
|
Stormcrow
Posts: 587
Joined: 12/9/2007
Status: offline
|
"And its end will come with a flood." Daniel 9:26 So prophesied Daniel about the end of Jerusalem. Here's how the Jewish historian, Flavius Josephus described its end: Yet was the misery itself more terrible than this disorder; for one would have thought that the hill itself, on which the temple stood, was seething hot, as full of fire on every part of it, that the blood was larger in quantity than the fire, and those that were slain more in number than those that slew them; for the ground did no where appear visible, for the dead bodies that lay on it; but the soldiers went over heaps of those bodies, as they ran upon such as fled from them. And now it was that the multitude of the robbers were thrust out [of the inner court of the temple by the Romans,] and had much ado to get into the outward court, and from thence into the city, while the remainder of the populace fled into the cloister of that outer court. As for the priests, some of them plucked up from the holy house the spikes (18) that were upon it, with their bases, which were made of lead, and shot them at the Romans instead of darts. But then as they gained nothing by so doing, and as the fire burst out upon them, they retired to the wall that was eight cubits broad, and there they tarried; yet did two of these of eminence among them, who might have saved themselves by going over to the Romans, or have borne up with courage, and taken their fortune with the others, throw themselves into the fire, and were burnt together with the holy house; their names were Meirus the son of Belgas, and Joseph the son of Daleus. The War of the Jews, Book 6, Chapter 5, Section 1 So the Romans being now become masters of the walls, they both placed their ensigns upon the towers, and made joyful acclamations for the victory they had gained, as having found the end of this war much lighter than its beginning; for when they had gotten upon the last wall, without any bloodshed, they could hardly believe what they found to be true; but seeing nobody to oppose them, they stood in doubt what such an unusual solitude could mean. But when they went in numbers into the lanes of the city with their swords drawn, they slew those whom they overtook without and set fire to the houses whither the Jews were fled, and burnt every soul in them, and laid waste a great many of the rest; and when they were come to the houses to plunder them, they found in them entire families of dead men, and the upper rooms full of dead corpses, that is, of such as died by the famine; they then stood in a horror at this sight, and went out without touching any thing. But although they had this commiseration for such as were destroyed in that manner, yet had they not the same for those that were still alive, but they ran every one through whom they met with, and obstructed the very lanes with their dead bodies, and made the whole city run down with blood, to such a degree indeed that the fire of many of the houses was quenched with these men's blood. And truly so it happened, that though the slayers left off at the evening, yet did the fire greatly prevail in the night; and as all was burning, came that eighth day of the month Gorpieus [Elul] upon Jerusalem, a city that had been liable to so many miseries during this siege, that, had it always enjoyed as much happiness from its first foundation, it would certainly have been the envy of the world. Nor did it on any other account so much deserve these sore misfortunes, as by producing such a generation of men as were the occasions of this its overthrow. The War of the Jews, Book 6, Chapter 8, Section 5. Don't gloss over this event. Don't look past it as though it held no meaning except as a brief mention for Christ. He wept bitterly over it. He lamented over it because He saw it as no one else could, and tried to impart its impact to us. People need to get up to speed on this and stop seeing eschatology through the extremely myopic lens of 21st century American Evangelicalism. A rather derogatory phrase comes to mind when I think of the church and teachers today that believe this was somehow "no big deal" by the way they look toward some "unnamed, unknown, and unseen" antichrist in some distant future only they can relate to us in the books they sell for $14.95 and up: "Get over yourselves."
|
|
|
|
RE: Revelation question - 3/7/2010 11:20:41 AM
|
|
|
Stormcrow
Posts: 587
Joined: 12/9/2007
Status: offline
|
quote:
In verse 14, He's wrapping up His summary on the signs of His coming: the things WE are to look for before His return. I'm wrong. Here's how the passage reads from the literal Greek: |2532| And |2784| will be proclaimed |5124| this |2098| Good News |3588| of the |0932| kingdom |1722| in |3680| all |3588| the |3625| inhabited earth |1519| for |3142| a testimony |3956| to all |3588| the |1484| nations, |2532| and |5119| then |2240| will come |3588| the |5156| end. Key words: "inhabited earth" (Strong's 3625), and "end" (Strong's 5156). I had "end" (tromos) right but missed the words "inhabited earth." Here's how Strong's 3625 defines the "inhabited earth" from the Greek: Strong's Ref. # 3625 Romanized oikoumene Pronounced oy-kou-men'-ay feminine participle present passive of GSN3611 (as noun, by implication of GSN1093); land, i.e. the (terrene part of the) globe; specifically, the Roman empire: KJV--earth, world. So now read Matthew 24:14-15 again with the Greek applied: "And this gospel of the kingdom shall be preached in the Roman Empire for a witness to all the nations, and then the trembling shall come. "Therefore when you see the abomination of desolation which was spoken of through Daniel the prophet, standing in the holy place (let the reader understand: Jerusalem surrounded by armies, Luke 21)..." I stand corrected. And now, so should we all. The "trembling" here relates specifically to the siege of Jerusalem. I'm going to retire for awhile and reevaluate some issues.
|
|
|
|
RE: Revelation question - 3/8/2010 1:58:52 AM
|
|
|
Ntech
Posts: 62
Joined: 5/3/2005
Status: offline
|
In response I would go with the following. The verse from 5 randomly picked versions. Matthew 24:14 New International Version (NIV) 14 And this gospel of the kingdom will be preached in the whole world as a testimony to all nations, and then the end will come. Worldwide English (New Testament) (WE) 14 This good news about the kingdom will be told in all the world. The people in all countries must know about it. And then the end will come.' Darby Translation (DARBY) 14 And these glad tidings of the kingdom shall be preached in the whole habitable earth, for a witness to all the nations, and then shall come the end. Public Domain King James Version (KJV) 14 And this gospel of the kingdom shall be preached in all the world for a witness unto all nations; and then shall the end come. Amplified Bible (AMP) 14 And this good news of the kingdom (the Gospel) will be preached throughout the whole world as a testimony to all the nations, and then will come the end. The 5 different interpretators here all come to the same conclusion. The message was to go to the entire world. Not just the Roman Empire. But the real question was why did it have to go out to the entire world? And that question is answered all the way back in the book of Genesis. chap 18 18 Seeing that Abraham shall surely become a great and mighty nation, and all the nations of the earth shall be blessed in him? chap 22 17 That in blessing I will bless thee, and in multiplying I will multiply thy seed as the stars of the heaven, and as the sand which is upon the sea shore; and thy seed shall possess the gate of his enemies; 18 And in thy seed shall all the nations of the earth be blessed; because thou hast obeyed my voice. And the prophecy of chapters 48 and 49 which state at the time of Shiloh (end times) that the offspring of Jacob/Israel would become dozens if not hundreds of nations by the end times. The point of sending the gospel out to the world was that it's a rescue mission to all those distant descendants of Abraham and Jacob. And fufill thost ancient promises of Genesis.
|
|
|
|
RE: Revelation question - 3/9/2010 12:45:39 AM
|
|
|
Stormcrow
Posts: 587
Joined: 12/9/2007
Status: offline
|
Ntech... The translators are wrong. Here, again, is the passage literally translated from the Greek with Strong's Reference numbers beside them: quote:
|2532| And |2784| will be proclaimed |5124| this |2098| Good News |3588| of the |0932| kingdom |1722| in |3680| all |3588| the |3625| inhabited earth |1519| for |3142| a testimony |3956| to all |3588| the |1484| nations, |2532| and |5119| then |2240| will come |3588| the |5156| end. Strong's Ref. # 3625 Romanized oikoumene Pronounced oy-kou-men'-ay feminine participle present passive of GSN3611 (as noun, by implication of GSN1093); land, i.e. the (terrene part of the) globe; specifically, the Roman empire: KJV--earth, world. In doing further research on this word, I found the following: quote:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ecumene Ecumene (also spelled œcumene or oikoumene) a term originally used in the Greco-Roman world to refer to the inhabited earth (or at least the known part of it). The term derives from the Greek οἰκουμένη (oikouménē, the feminine present middle participle of the verb οἰκέω, oikéō, "to inhabit"), short for οἰκουμένη γῆ "inhabited world".[1] In modern connotations it refers either to the projection of a united Christian Church or to world civilizations. Over time, the word came to mean the civilized world, and to be synonymous with the Roman Empire. This usage continued after the division of the Empire into East and West, and the East Roman Emperors would use the term to describe their imperial administration. Constantinople itself came to be known as the "Ecumenical City". The word was adopted within Christianity, especially for Synods called by the Emperors and composed of bishops throughout the world (see Ecumenical Councils). Bob97 had an excellent post about how this error crept first into Protestantism, then Evangelicalism: quote:
Luther became convinced that the prophecies of Daniel were about the Roman Catholic Church and that Papal Rome was indeed the antichrist of the Bible prophecy. Hundreds of thousands of people left the RCC. In retaliation the RCC began a campaign to counter the claims of Luther at the Council of Trent. The Jesuits were commissioned by the Pope to develop a new interpretation of Scripture that would counteract the Protestant application of the RCC. Francisco Ribera, a Jesuit priest published a commentary on Revelation as a counter-interpretation in 1590. Ribera applied all of Revelation except the earliest chapters to the end time rather than to the history of the Church. Antichrist would be a single evil person who would be received by the Jews and would rebuild the temple. “Ribera denied the Protestant Scriptural Antichrist (2 Thessalonians 2) as seated in the church of God—asserted by Augustine, Jerome, Luther and many reformers. He set on an infidel Antichrist, outside the church of God. For almost 300 years the Jesuit Futurism remained largely inside the RCC but in the 1800s the process of adoption into the Protestants began. There were many steps to this adoption but it really all came to a head with Nelson Darby when he became a strong promoter of a Pre-Tribulation Rapture followed by a one man antichrist; this teaching became the hallmark of Dispensationalist. It was Darby who laid much of the foundation for the present popular removal of Daniel’s 70th week away from history and applied it to a future tribulation after the rapture. Cyrus Ingerson Scofield later adopted the teaching of Darby into his Scofield Reference Bible and this doctrine became firmly established inside the 20th century American Church These are the facts as I see them from my research. While Bob's source deals mainly with the interpretation of Daniel 9, it applies to our discussion because Daniel 9 is specifically mentioned in Matt.24:15! So the translators have been displaying a Jesuit bias when interpreting Matthew 24! So look at the context of Matthew 24:14-22 again with the Greek properly translated and see if it doesn't make more sense: quote:
And this gospel of the kingdom shall be preached in all the ROMAN EMPIRE (oikoumene) for a witness unto all nations; and then shall the TREMBLING (tromos) come. When ye therefore shall see the abomination of desolation, spoken of by Daniel the prophet, stand in the holy place, (whoso readeth, let him understand:) Then let them which be in Judaea flee into the mountains: Let him which is on the housetop not come down to take any thing out of his house: Neither let him which is in the field return back to take his clothes. And woe unto them that are with child, and to them that give suck in those days! But pray ye that your flight be not in the winter, neither on the sabbath day: For then shall be great tribulation (thlipsis), such as was not since the beginning of the world to this time, no, nor ever shall be. And except those days should be shortened, there should no flesh be saved: but for the elect's sake those days shall be shortened. Matthew 24:14-22 (KJV) And now, the parallel passage from Luke that interprets Matthew: quote:
And when ye shall see Jerusalem compassed with armies, then know that the desolation thereof is nigh. Then let them which are in Judaea flee to the mountains; and let them which are in the midst of it depart out; and let not them that are in the countries enter thereinto. For these be the days of vengeance, that all things which are written may be fulfilled. But woe unto them that are with child, and to them that give suck, in those days! for there shall be great distress in the land, and wrath upon this people. And they shall fall by the edge of the sword, and shall be led away captive into all nations: and Jerusalem shall be trodden down of the Gentiles, until the times of the Gentiles be fulfilled. Luke 21:20-24 (KJV) In fact, despite my earlier contention that verses 4-9 of Matthew 24 coincided with the first 5 seals in Revelation 6, I am now willing to admit I may be wrong on that count (still evaluating this). Furthermore, on those grounds, I believe Daniel's 70th week was finished in the destruction of Jerusalem and the desolation of Israel, as Luke wrote: For these be the days of vengeance, that all things which are written may be fulfilled. None of this affects my earlier posts on the harmonization of the 6th Seal of Revelation 6 and 7 to Matthew 24:29-31 and 1 Thessalonians 4:16-17. (Edited to remove absolute statements, as I am still working on this.)
< Message edited by Stormcrow -- 3/9/2010 8:56:52 AM >
|
|
|
|
RE: Revelation question - 3/9/2010 10:34:59 AM
|
|
|
Montana Marv
Posts: 381
Joined: 4/12/2005
Status: offline
|
To All So if the 70th week is finished or was finished in 70 AD: Then Daniels people (Israel) and Daniels holy city (Jerusalem) have fulfilled each of the six tasks, being 1. Finish transgression, 2. Put an end to sin, 3. To atone for wickedness, 4. To bring in everlasting righteousness, 5. To seal up vision and prophecy, 6. To anoint the most holy. Israel still: Transgresses, Sins, has Wickedness. They have not ushered in Everlasting Righteousness, Sealed up vision and Prophecy or anointed the most holy. For any to be left out of the prophecy, means the prophecy is not completed and what goes with the prophecy, then has not been fulfilled. All Must be Fulfilled. Only Daniels people and holy city can fulfill the six tasks. In Christ Montana Marv
|
|
|
|
RE: Revelation question - 3/9/2010 11:27:51 AM
|
|
|
bob97
Posts: 1205
Joined: 6/24/2006
From: Kansas
Status: offline
|
There seems to be one key truth that stares me in the face and that is the fact that the "He" in Dan 9;27 who confirms a covenant is not some future antichrist but is in fact the Messiah (Jesus Christ). The mission of Christ in the gospels was two fold: to complete the prophecies to the Jews and with His death on the cross to usher in the New Covenant. Christ accomplished just that; He fulfilled all of the prophecies of the Old Covenant (Old Testament). The mission of Christ was to fulfill the Law and Prophets. He told Israel: “Think not that I am come to destroy the Law and the Prophets (Old Covenant): I am not come to Destroy, but to fulfill (not to institute). For verily I say unto you, Till earth and heaven pass, one jot or one tittle shall in no wise pass from the Law, till all be FULFILLED (Matt. 5:17-18; see Lk. 24:37-44-46). Christ then with His death upon the cross, His resurrection and ascension completed the second phase of His mission; the arrival of the Holy Spirit onto the world and the New Covenant unto man. A spiritual covenant where mankind glorifies the creator within their minds in spirit and truth. So what has happened here? It seems that the foundation of our beliefs on prophecy has been altered somewhat…we no longer have an antichrist who confirms a seven year agreement and breaks that agreement after 3 ½ years. It seems that we can now read Revelation in a whole new light, where much of the book is historical and that aspect of the book that is future might have a somewhat different understand. The finial outcome is the same but the concept of characters we are looking for has changed somewhat. I know that I must now study Revelation with a new understanding and not with a false premise invented by man.
_____________________________
The LORD clears the road for me! The LORD is my high ridge, my stronghold, my deliverer!
|
|
|
|
RE: Revelation question - 3/9/2010 12:34:04 PM
|
|
|
bob97
Posts: 1205
Joined: 6/24/2006
From: Kansas
Status: offline
|
Marv I'm sure that you have read this but I'll post it anyway...It is Matthew Henry's commentary on Dan 9:24. Let's see what he has to say. We have, in verses Dan 9:24-27, one of the most remarkable prophecies of Christ, of his coming and his salvation. It shows that the Jews are guilty of most obstinate unbelief, in expecting another Messiah, so long after the time expressly fixed for his coming. The seventy weeks mean a day for a year, or 490 years. About the end of this period a sacrifice would be offered, making full atonement for sin, and bringing in everlasting righteousness for the complete justification of every believer. Then the Jews, in the crucifixion of Jesus, would commit that crime by which the measure of their guilt would be filled up, and troubles would come upon their nation. All blessings bestowed on sinful man come through Christ's atoning sacrifice, who suffered once for sins, the just for the unjust, that he might bring us to God. Here is our way of access to the throne of grace, and of our entrance to heaven. This seals the sum of prophecy, and confirms the covenant with many; and while we rejoice in the blessings of salvation, we should remember what they cost the Redeemer. How can those escape who neglect so great salvation!Matthew Henry Concise Bible Commentary. In Messiah, Bob
_____________________________
The LORD clears the road for me! The LORD is my high ridge, my stronghold, my deliverer!
|
|
|
|
RE: Revelation question - 3/9/2010 12:45:20 PM
|
|
|
bob97
Posts: 1205
Joined: 6/24/2006
From: Kansas
Status: offline
|
Here is what Adam Clark has to say about Dan 9:24... Seventy weeks are determined—The Jews had Sabbatic years, Leviticus 25:8, by which their years were divided into weeks of years, as in this important prophecy, each week containing seven years. The seventy weeks therefore here spoken of amount to four hundred and ninety years. In verse 24 there are six events mentioned which should be the consequences of the incarnation of our Lord:— I. To finish (לכלא lechalle, to restrain), the transgression which was effected by the preaching of the Gospel, and pouring out of the Holy Ghost among men. (First part of Acts) II. To make an end of sins; rather ולהתם חטאות ulehathem chataoth, "to make an end of sin-offerings," which our Lord did when he offered his spotless soul and body on the cross once for all. III. To make reconciliation (ולכפר ulechapper, "to make atonement or expiation") for iniquity; which he did by the once offering up of himself. IV. To bring in everlasting righteousness, צדק עלמים tsedek olamim, that is, "the righteousness, or righteous ONE, of ages;" that person who had been the object of the faith of mankind, and the subject of the predictions of the prophets through all the ages of the world. V. To seal up (ולחתם velachtom, "to finish or complete") the vision and prophecy; that is, to put an end to the necessity of any farther revelations, by completing the canon of Scripture, and fulfilling the prophecies which related to his person, sacrifice, and the glory that should follow. VI. And to anoint the Most Holy, קדש קדשים kodesh kodashim, "the Holy of holies." משיח mashach, to anoint, (from which comes משיח mashiach, the Messiah, the anointed one), signifies in general, to consecrate or appoint to some special office. Here it means the consecration or appointment of our blessed Lord, the Holy One of Israel, to be the Prophet, Priest, and King of mankind. In Messiah, Bob
_____________________________
The LORD clears the road for me! The LORD is my high ridge, my stronghold, my deliverer!
|
|
|
|
RE: Revelation question - 3/9/2010 12:52:25 PM
|
|
|
Montana Marv
Posts: 381
Joined: 4/12/2005
Status: offline
|
Bob If your are quoting Matthew Henry; Then do you believe the the 1st Seal is the spreading of Gods Word. Or is it Islam or is it the Catholic Church, or Communism, Capitalism as some have posted. Not necessarily in that order. Now you are just picking and choosing to side with your arguments of the 70th Week. You give supporting "evidence" from this author, yet deny other things he has said. In Christ Montana Marv
< Message edited by Montana Marv -- 3/9/2010 1:06:25 PM >
|
|
|
|
RE: Revelation question - 3/9/2010 1:40:25 PM
|
|
|
bob97
Posts: 1205
Joined: 6/24/2006
From: Kansas
Status: offline
|
Marv…all I’m trying to show is the overriding view on the 70th week that existed in the world before the unset of Darby and Skofield; on material that was essentially generated by the RCC to combat the views of Martin Luther. You might say the world views on end time prophecy before and after the Skofield Bible. In Messiah, Bob
_____________________________
The LORD clears the road for me! The LORD is my high ridge, my stronghold, my deliverer!
|
|
|
|
RE: Revelation question - 3/9/2010 2:30:46 PM
|
|
|
Montana Marv
Posts: 381
Joined: 4/12/2005
Status: offline
|
quote:
ORIGINAL: bob97 Here is what Adam Clark has to say about Dan 9:24... Seventy weeks are determined—The Jews had Sabbatic years, Leviticus 25:8, by which their years were divided into weeks of years, as in this important prophecy, each week containing seven years. The seventy weeks therefore here spoken of amount to four hundred and ninety years. In verse 24 there are six events mentioned which should be the consequences of the incarnation of our Lord:— I. To finish (לכלא lechalle, to restrain), the transgression which was effected by the preaching of the Gospel, and pouring out of the Holy Ghost among men. (First part of Acts) II. To make an end of sins; rather ולהתם חטאות ulehathem chataoth, "to make an end of sin-offerings," which our Lord did when he offered his spotless soul and body on the cross once for all. III. To make reconciliation (ולכפר ulechapper, "to make atonement or expiation") for iniquity; which he did by the once offering up of himself. IV. To bring in everlasting righteousness, צדק עלמים tsedek olamim, that is, "the righteousness, or righteous ONE, of ages;" that person who had been the object of the faith of mankind, and the subject of the predictions of the prophets through all the ages of the world. V. To seal up (ולחתם velachtom, "to finish or complete") the vision and prophecy; that is, to put an end to the necessity of any farther revelations, by completing the canon of Scripture, and fulfilling the prophecies which related to his person, sacrifice, and the glory that should follow. VI. And to anoint the Most Holy, קדש קדשים kodesh kodashim, "the Holy of holies." משיח mashach, to anoint, (from which comes משיח mashiach, the Messiah, the anointed one), signifies in general, to consecrate or appoint to some special office. Here it means the consecration or appointment of our blessed Lord, the Holy One of Israel, to be the Prophet, Priest, and King of mankind. In Messiah, Bob Bob All you are quoting are what others are saying about Christ. Are they substituting or are you substituting what's written in Daniel. What About Daniel and his people (Israel) and Daniels holy city (Jerusalem). When are they going to do the six tasks. For this is the Prophecy. Let's look at Zechariah. 12:10 - And I will pour out on the house of David and the inhabitants of Jerusalem a spirit of grace and supplication. They will look on me, the one they have pierced.... 13:1 - On that day a fountain will be opened to the house of David and the inhabitants of Jerusalem, to cleanse them from Sin and Impurity 14:4 - On that day his feet will stand on the Mt of Olives, east of Jerusalem, and the Mt of Olives will be split from east to west, forming a great valley.... 14:6 - On that day there will be no light, no cold or frost. It will be a unique day, without day time or night time, a day known to te Lord. When evening comes, there will be light. 14:8 - On that day living water will flow out from Jerusalem, half to the eastern sea and half to the western sea, in summer and in winter. 14:9 - The Lord will be king over the whole earth. On that day there will be one Lord, and his name the only name. In Christ Montana Marv
|
|
|
|
RE: Revelation question - 3/9/2010 2:52:42 PM
|
|
|
bob97
Posts: 1205
Joined: 6/24/2006
From: Kansas
Status: offline
|
Marv...what was the purpose of Christ when he came to this earth as a man; the purpose as stated in the four gospels? The next question is did He fulfill this purpose or was His death in vain? In Messiah, Bob
_____________________________
The LORD clears the road for me! The LORD is my high ridge, my stronghold, my deliverer!
|
|
|
|
RE: Revelation question - 3/9/2010 3:29:40 PM
|
|
|
Montana Marv
Posts: 381
Joined: 4/12/2005
Status: offline
|
quote:
ORIGINAL: bob97 Marv...what was the purpose of Christ when he came to this earth as a man; the purpose as stated in the four gospels? The next question is did He fulfill this purpose or was His death in vain? In Messiah, Bob Bob We are taking about Prophecy. Christ did fulfill His purpose, His death was not in vain. But when are Israel and Jerusalem going to fulfill their purpose. We as Gentiles have been grafted into the Vine because of Christs Death and Resurrection. But when are the Jews to be re grafted back into the Vine. For this is what Daniel 9:24 - 27 is all about. The future re grafting of Israel back into the Vine. In Christ Montana Marv
|
|
|
|
RE: Revelation question - 3/9/2010 3:42:02 PM
|
|
|
Montana Marv
Posts: 381
Joined: 4/12/2005
Status: offline
|
To All Daniel 9:24 will be fulfilled when Israel is re grafted back into the Vine (Jesus Christ). Plain and simple. In Christ Montana Marv
|
|
|
|
RE: Revelation question - 3/9/2010 6:51:00 PM
|
|
|
bob97
Posts: 1205
Joined: 6/24/2006
From: Kansas
Status: offline
|
quote:
We are taking about Prophecy. Christ did fulfill His purpose, His death was not in vain. But when are Israel and Jerusalem going to fulfill their purpose. We as Gentiles have been grafted into the Vine because of Christs Death and Resurrection. But when are the Jews to be re grafted back into the Vine. For this is what Daniel 9:24 - 27 is all about. The future re grafting of Israel back into the Vine. Marv...Israel will be brought back into holiness at the end of this age, just as God has promised but they will be brought back under the terms of the New Covenant. What was closed out at the first advent of Christ was all of the prophecies regarding how God was dealing with Israel under the terms of the Old Covenant. In the gospels Christ was still dealing with Israel under the terms of the Leviticus law and until everything that God had promised happened it could not end. God promises to save the tribes of Judah and Israel under the terms of the New Covenant. The New Covenant could not come into play until Christ had returned to the Father and the Holy Spirit was sent to indwell the believers. Of course this did not happen until Acts, 50 days after the crucifixion. There is no dispute about the combined tribes that comprise Israel and how they will be returned to the fold at the end of this age; they are after all still God’s elect. In Messiah, Bob
_____________________________
The LORD clears the road for me! The LORD is my high ridge, my stronghold, my deliverer!
|
|
|
|
RE: Revelation question - 3/9/2010 10:54:26 PM
|
|
|
Ntech
Posts: 62
Joined: 5/3/2005
Status: offline
|
Well, taking another tack here then. If the 70th week and Matthew 24-15 was fulfilled in the first century AD then there is a problem. Revelation 20 4 And I saw thrones, and they sat upon them, and judgment was given unto them: and I saw the souls of them that were beheaded for the witness of Jesus, and for the word of God, and which had not worshipped the beast, neither his image, neither had received his mark upon their foreheads, or in their hands; and they lived and reigned with Christ a thousand years. 5 But the rest of the dead lived not again until the thousand years were finished. This is the first resurrection. 6 Blessed and holy is he that hath part in the first resurrection: on such the second death hath no power, but they shall be priests of God and of Christ, and shall reign with him a thousand years. 7 And when the thousand years are expired, Satan shall be loosed out of his prison, 8 And shall go out to deceive the nations which are in the four quarters of the earth, Gog, and Magog, to gather them together to battle: the number of whom is as the sand of the sea. 9 And they went up on the breadth of the earth, and compassed the camp of the saints about, and the beloved city: and fire came down from God out of heaven, and devoured them. 10 And the devil that deceived them was cast into the lake of fire and brimstone, where the beast and the false prophet are, and shall be tormented day and night for ever and ever. This event never happened in the 11th century. Where was the 2nd battle of Gog and Magog? Or the first for that matter? Those events never happened. The white throne judgement has never occured as far as I know. As I have pointed out before. There is unfinished business dating back thousands of years. Daniel is incomplete. And so is Matthew 24. The curse of Malachi/Hosea is still running. It is simply impossible that Jerusalem in 70 AD fulfilled the prophecy of Matthew 24. The world would have been destroyed and the new world and Jerusalem would be here by now. The question being answered is "what is the sign of the end of the world?" And the first century AD was not the end of the world.
|
|
|
|
RE: Revelation question - 3/9/2010 11:19:37 PM
|
|
|
bob97
Posts: 1205
Joined: 6/24/2006
From: Kansas
Status: offline
|
Ntech...of course Matt 24 is incomplete, so is Revelation but I don't think that you have to have a last week for these things to occur. It's just the signs that we have been expecting do not necessarily have to happen. For example, If Christ is the one who makes the covenant in Dan 9:27, we can't be looking for an antichrist to make a covenant for 7 years to start the week off...see what I mean? That whole scenario is based on it is the antichrist in 9:27 who makes the covenant. In Messiah, Bob
_____________________________
The LORD clears the road for me! The LORD is my high ridge, my stronghold, my deliverer!
|
|
|
|
RE: Revelation question - 3/9/2010 11:38:02 PM
|
|
|
Ntech
Posts: 62
Joined: 5/3/2005
Status: offline
|
To answer your question there it is an antichrist that signs an agreement. Because if Daniel 9-27 is incomplete then so is Daniel 11. Daniel 11 6 And in the end of years they shall join themselves together; for the king's daughter of the south shall come to the king of the north to make an agreement: but she shall not retain the power of the arm; neither shall he stand, nor his arm: but she shall be given up, and they that brought her, and he that begat her, and he that strengthened her in these times. The end of years would be the 70th week. This is a end time prophecy. What happened in the ancient world that looked like it was fulfilling the prophecy is irrevelent. It never fit the timeframe of the prophecy. Therefore the agreement of 9-27 is signed in verse 11-6. And the abomination of desolation is verse 11-31. It's not Jesus Christ.
|
|
|
|
RE: Revelation question - 3/10/2010 12:13:46 AM
|
|
|
Stormcrow
Posts: 587
Joined: 12/9/2007
Status: offline
|
quote:
This event never happened in the 11th century. Where was the 2nd battle of Gog and Magog? Or the first for that matter? Those events never happened. The white throne judgement has never occured as far as I know. Of course it hasn't. Revelation 20 is looking at Christ's return to establish His millennial kingdom. We haven't gotten there yet because the earth has not yet been through the "Day of the Lord." quote:
Daniel 11 6 And in the end of years they shall join themselves together; for the king's daughter of the south shall come to the king of the north to make an agreement: but she shall not retain the power of the arm; neither shall he stand, nor his arm: but she shall be given up, and they that brought her, and he that begat her, and he that strengthened her in these times. The end of years would be the 70th week. This is a end time prophecy. What happened in the ancient world that looked like it was fulfilling the prophecy is irrevelent. It never fit the timeframe of the prophecy. Ntech: All of Daniel 11 refers to things that have already happened: the king of the north was Antiochus IV Epiphanes. The king of the south was Ptolemy. Antiochus was to marry the daughter of Ptolemy to seal a peace agreement between Egypt and Syria (south and north). It didn't work. This has all been shown to you before. The 70th week was completely fulfilled with the destruction and desolation of Jerusalem, per Luke's passage in Luke 21: quote:
And when ye shall see Jerusalem compassed with armies, then know that the desolation thereof is nigh. Then let them which are in Judaea flee to the mountains; and let them which are in the midst of it depart out; and let not them that are in the countries enter thereinto. For these be the days of vengeance, that all things which are written may be fulfilled. We have plenty of Bible interpreters here. We do seem, however, to suffer from a severe dearth of historians. quote:
It is simply impossible that Jerusalem in 70 AD fulfilled the prophecy of Matthew 24. The world would have been destroyed and the new world and Jerusalem would be here by now. The question being answered is "what is the sign of the end of the world?" No. The first question which was put to Christ was: quote:
“Tell us, when will this (the destruction of the Temple) happen? He goes on to answer this question: you will see false Christ's and false prophets, wars, famines, earthquakes in various places: BUT THIS IS NOT THE END. Then you will be persecuted to death for my name's sake. But he who endures to the end will be saved. And then this gospel will be preached throughout the Roman Empire, and then the trembling will come. And what is the trembling? The utter, abject fear of seeing armies (Roman Legions) surrounding Jerusalem bent on its destruction. Why??? For these be the days of vengeance, that all things which are written may be fulfilled.
< Message edited by Stormcrow -- 3/10/2010 12:32:47 AM >
|
|
|
|
RE: Revelation question - 3/10/2010 12:28:42 AM
|
|
|
Stormcrow
Posts: 587
Joined: 12/9/2007
Status: offline
|
One more thing: You don't need Daniel's 70th week to understand Revelation. It's immaterial to Revelation since it (the 70th week) has already been fulfilled.
|
|
|
|
RE: Revelation question - 3/10/2010 12:50:39 AM
|
|
|
Ezra
Posts: 1828
Status: offline
|
quote:
ORIGINAL: Stormcrow One more thing: You don't need Daniel's 70th week to understand Revelation. It's immaterial to Revelation since it (the 70th week) has already been fulfilled. Right. The Great Tribulation is over, the Millenium is over, Satan is already in the Lake of Fire, the New Heavens and the New Earth have been established, and we are all now living in the best of all possible worlds. It's amazing how some can be so deluded.
_____________________________
And whosoever will, let him take the Water of Life freely. Revelation 22:17
|
|
|
|
RE: Revelation question - 3/10/2010 1:00:15 AM
|
|
|
Stormcrow
Posts: 587
Joined: 12/9/2007
Status: offline
|
quote:
Right. The Great Tribulation is over, the Millenium is over, Satan is already in the Lake of Fire, the New Heavens and the New Earth have been established, and we are all now living in the best of all possible worlds. Strawman arguments not allowed. No one is suggesting such things. If you're not even going to try to understand what's being written, why bother reading this material at all? If it upsets you so much, why visit this thread? quote:
It's amazing how some can be so deluded. Kinda' skipped the part where you provide evidence and went straight to the name-calling, huh?
|
|
|
|
RE: Revelation question - 3/10/2010 10:11:48 AM
|
|
|
ta_mosquito
Posts: 11820
Joined: 3/31/2005
From: from MN, now in Ontario :D
Status: offline
|
In an attempt to consolidate for the purpose of effective moderation we have created a One Stop thread for the topic of Preterism. Please note that ALL discussion of Preterism must ONLY be done in the one-stop thread. Further Preterism related posts outside of that thread will be deleted and reported possibly resulting in being banned from this Forum. Please continue your discussion in the One Stop Thread. Here is the link: CLICK HERE Please contact admin at community@salemwebnetwork.com with any comments or questions regarding this. Thank you! Tricia Forums Moderator Please do not reply to this message within the Community. Please email Community@salemwebnetwork.com with questions, comments, or concerns. Please do not send me PMs regarding this message.
|
|
|
|
New Messages |
No New Messages |
Hot Topic w/ New Messages |
Hot Topic w/o New Messages |
Locked w/ New Messages |
Locked w/o New Messages |
|
Post New Thread
Reply to Message
Post New Poll
Submit Vote
Delete My Own Post
Delete My Own Thread
Rate Posts |
|
|