Forum Tools
Forums |  Register |  Login |  My Profile |  Inbox |  Address Book |  My Subscription |  My Forums 

Photo Gallery |  Member List |  Search |  Calendars |  FAQ |  TOS |  Disclaimer |  Ticket List |  Log Out | 

What is considered stealing?

 
View related threads: (in this forum | in all forums)

Logged in as: Guest
Users viewing this topic: none
  Printable Version
All Forums >> [Theology] >> Morality & Ethics >> What is considered stealing?
Jump to post #:
Page: [1] 2 3   next >   >>
Login
Message << Older Topic   Newer Topic >>
What is considered stealing? - 3/8/2010 10:27:37 AM   
GodsPrincess7


Posts: 75
Joined: 5/1/2005
Status: offline
I have been toying with these questions for the past few days and am wondering what fellow Christians think about it...

So your neighbor has wifi and your computer just happens to pick up the signal, and it doesn't require a code or password to use it. Do you feel that this is considered stealing? Is it wrong to 'borrow' your neighbors wifi?

A lot of people have the ability to download software to be able to break a DVD security code, in other words, your copying a DVD. Is that stealing? What if there are sites out there that are able to allow you to download new movies that are still in theaters? Is that stealing?

What do you think?
Post #: 1
RE: What is considered stealing? - 3/8/2010 10:54:47 AM   
thebaker


Posts: 455
Joined: 11/25/2009
Status: offline
the dvd/movie issue has come up before in other threads so i won't go into that one because that goes on forever. but simply put, breaking the code to make copies, download, etc even if there is a program that allows it, it's wrong. just because a program lets you do it doesn't mean it's ok to do.

the wifi issue to me seems tricky. i've heard many people say taht they can pick up wifi in various areas when traelling by train or bus or whatever. and they're not out to beg, borrow, or steal wifi, that's the nature of wifi. i think if you're in your own house and you have wifi and you just happen to get your neighbor's wifi but you use yours, you're not doing anything wrong. BUT if you decide not to get wifi because your neighbor has it and you'll just use theirs, then you're stealing.

_____________________________

"Be who you are and say what you feel, because those who mind don't matter and those who matter don't mind."
-Dr. Seuss

"Map out your future, but do it in pencil."
-Jon Bon Jovi
Post #: 2
RE: What is considered stealing? - 3/8/2010 10:56:56 AM   
GodandGuns


Posts: 1507
Joined: 10/1/2008
From: The Sound of Madness
Status: offline
same as is it a sin. if you have to ask?..........

_____________________________

FOR THOSE WHO HAVE FOUGHT FOR IT, FREEDOM HAS A TASTE THE PROTECTED WILL NEVER KNOW.

The Medic, the unsung hero on every battlefield. It is impossible to imagine the mental/emotional trauma inside a Medic, and there is no triage for that.
Post #: 3
RE: What is considered stealing? - 3/8/2010 1:15:05 PM   
Kerrlaw


Posts: 5344
Joined: 5/24/2006
From: Big Orange Country
Status: offline
In my opinion, copying the DVDs by disabling the security system is definitely stealing.

Using wifi, IMO, is not. My reasoning is that a wifi signal is comparable to an over the air TV signal, it is there for the taking, and is not depriving anyone of their copyright rights. If my understanding of wifi is wrong (I am not very computer savvy) someone can tell me.

_____________________________

That which does not kill us makes us fatter. ~ crankius
Post #: 4
RE: What is considered stealing? - 3/8/2010 1:27:46 PM   
NotreDame

 

Posts: 466
Joined: 4/14/2009
From: 5 hours south of the Golden Dome of Notre Dame
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: thebaker

the dvd/movie issue has come up before in other threads so i won't go into that one because that goes on forever. but simply put, breaking the code to make copies, download, etc even if there is a program that allows it, it's wrong. just because a program lets you do it doesn't mean it's ok to do.

the wifi issue to me seems tricky. i've heard many people say taht they can pick up wifi in various areas when traelling by train or bus or whatever. and they're not out to beg, borrow, or steal wifi, that's the nature of wifi. i think if you're in your own house and you have wifi and you just happen to get your neighbor's wifi but you use yours, you're not doing anything wrong. BUT if you decide not to get wifi because your neighbor has it and you'll just use theirs, then you're stealing.


What is being stolen in the WIFI example? I find it curious people attempt to answer the OP's question without first engaging in any analysis detailing, explaining, and conceptualizing the word "steal" and by extension "stealing." Many here so far seem content to just presume some preconceived notion of stealing, choose not to disclose it here, but proceed to answer in the affirmative or the negative whether stealing exists in either situation, upon this undisclosed preconceived idea of the word itself.

_____________________________

I cannot undertake to lay my finger on that article of the Constitution which granted a right to Congress of expending, on objects of benevolence, the money of their constituents.
James Madison, Father of the U.S. Constitution.
Post #: 5
RE: What is considered stealing? - 3/8/2010 1:50:16 PM   
FacingFoward

 

Posts: 56
Joined: 4/2/2009
Status: offline
Taking something that does not belong to you without permission is stealing.. Its not anymore complicated than that.
Post #: 6
RE: What is considered stealing? - 3/8/2010 1:59:52 PM   
FunBetty


Posts: 4997
Joined: 4/11/2005
From: Land o Cheesecake and Pizza
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: Kerrlaw

In my opinion, copying the DVDs by disabling the security system is definitely stealing.

Using wifi, IMO, is not. My reasoning is that a wifi signal is comparable to an over the air TV signal, it is there for the taking, and is not depriving anyone of their copyright rights. If my understanding of wifi is wrong (I am not very computer savvy) someone can tell me.


I think the concept is this: Neighbor A pays $50 to CompanyABC for internet service/wifi in his house. In order to have a wifi signal, a router must be rented/purchased to transmit that signal. The intention of the router/wifi is to be able to access that signal from anywhere in the house. Many times that signal is strong enough that it will reach other houses. However, the wifi signal is paid for by neighbor A.

If neighbor B happens to be close enough to pick up on that signal, he is not required to pay for his own internet signal. CompanyABC, therefore, loses $50/month because Neighbor B is not paying for it.

While I don't think this is a "copyright" issue, I do not think it is ethical to not pay for a service because you've managed to get it for free by other means.

Another issue to consider: when you purchase internet service, sometimes you have limited bandwidth or a set download/upload speed. With more computers using that same wifi, the connection will be slower and/or Neighbor A may have to pay additional costs for using extra bandwidth. (Assuming the neighbor didn't think to put a password on his router).

_____________________________

My PFY
Post #: 7
RE: What is considered stealing? - 3/8/2010 2:03:57 PM   
bolt.

 

Posts: 2378
Joined: 4/29/2005
From: Canada
Status: online
If you would not normally have purchased the service, and if you are not doing anything that would noticeably eat bandwidth, and if you are not circumventing any measures, I see no theft in that scenario.

_____________________________

Are you having trouble getting your daily dose of the life changing Word of God?
Let my friend Brian at Daily Audio Bible help you too.
>>audio link<<
Post #: 8
RE: What is considered stealing? - 3/8/2010 2:37:28 PM   
car2ner


Posts: 3178
Joined: 4/11/2005
From: just north of Florida
Status: offline
My mom lives in the house next door to ours. We have wifi and were planning on letting her share ours. We were able to, although the connection was poor, until the service provider changed our router/modem. Then our booster wouldn't sinc and that put and end to our sharing.

Now if someone parked outside of our house to use our wifi, expecting us to pay the bill but they get it for free, shame on them. If someone was passing thru and had to find a hot spot in a pinch, that's not a big deal in my mind, EXCEPT we have ours password protected.

_____________________________

http://www.car2ner.2ya.com
http://car2ner.imagekind.com
"May your days be long and your hardships few".
Post #: 9
RE: What is considered stealing? - 3/9/2010 9:36:01 AM   
NotreDame

 

Posts: 466
Joined: 4/14/2009
From: 5 hours south of the Golden Dome of Notre Dame
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: FacingFoward

Taking something that does not belong to you without permission is stealing.. Its not anymore complicated than that.


How does WIFI come within this definition? What about an item found on a sidewalk? What if one day you woke up and found some item in your backyard, and retrieved the item and took the item into your home? Let's say it was $100 bill, or a cd, a pair of tennis shoes, etcetera?

_____________________________

I cannot undertake to lay my finger on that article of the Constitution which granted a right to Congress of expending, on objects of benevolence, the money of their constituents.
James Madison, Father of the U.S. Constitution.
Post #: 10
RE: What is considered stealing? - 3/9/2010 9:39:29 AM   
FunBetty


Posts: 4997
Joined: 4/11/2005
From: Land o Cheesecake and Pizza
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: NotreDame

quote:

ORIGINAL: FacingFoward

Taking something that does not belong to you without permission is stealing.. Its not anymore complicated than that.


How does WIFI come within this definition?


Because someone else paid for that wifi signal.

_____________________________

My PFY
Post #: 11
RE: What is considered stealing? - 3/9/2010 9:41:23 AM   
NotreDame

 

Posts: 466
Joined: 4/14/2009
From: 5 hours south of the Golden Dome of Notre Dame
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: FunBetty

quote:

ORIGINAL: NotreDame

quote:

ORIGINAL: FacingFoward

Taking something that does not belong to you without permission is stealing.. Its not anymore complicated than that.


How does WIFI come within this definition?


Because someone else paid for that wifi signal.


So? What is being stolen? The wifi is not being "taken". The wifi is still there, it is still present, it still exists! What is being "taken" when someone else uses another individual's wifi?

_____________________________

I cannot undertake to lay my finger on that article of the Constitution which granted a right to Congress of expending, on objects of benevolence, the money of their constituents.
James Madison, Father of the U.S. Constitution.
Post #: 12
RE: What is considered stealing? - 3/9/2010 9:43:02 AM   
FunBetty


Posts: 4997
Joined: 4/11/2005
From: Land o Cheesecake and Pizza
Status: offline
Yes, it still "exists", but if you are using someone's wifi, you are slowing down their connection speed (and they may potentially be charged for using extra bandwidth).

_____________________________

My PFY
Post #: 13
RE: What is considered stealing? - 3/9/2010 9:43:52 AM   
MrFribbles


Posts: 2112
Joined: 1/29/2007
From: Hawaii, but I've moved around since then
Status: offline
Something to consider in the WIFI discussion -
It's the owner's initiative to password-protect their signal. If they leave their network open, isn't it possible that they intend for others to share their signal?
Post #: 14
RE: What is considered stealing? - 3/9/2010 9:46:25 AM   
FunBetty


Posts: 4997
Joined: 4/11/2005
From: Land o Cheesecake and Pizza
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: MrFribbles

Something to consider in the WIFI discussion -
It's the owner's initiative to password-protect their signal. If they leave their network open, isn't it possible that they intend for others to share their signal?


I believe this thread has repeated before....the same arguements have come up.

To answer that question with another question - if I leave the door unlocked to my house, does that mean it's okay for someone to come inside and sit on my couch? Is it my fault for making my couch accessible, or is it the intruder's fault for trespassing?

_____________________________

My PFY
Post #: 15
RE: What is considered stealing? - 3/9/2010 10:05:03 AM   
iwillfearnoevil


Posts: 1562
Joined: 11/6/2007
From: upstate NY
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: MrFribbles
Something to consider in the WIFI discussion -
It's the owner's initiative to password-protect their signal. If they leave their network open, isn't it possible that they intend for others to share their signal?


possibly their intention but sharing signal with others would be against their terms of service and likely one that would get them suspended if that was their intention to be a free hotspot. so i would be participating in an attempt to defraud or break an agreement between two people. doubtful they'd be caught and prosecuted but i could probably steal a pack of gum and not get caught if i chose.

p.s. using another's signal is against the law in many locations including some states
p.p.s. i have a feeling bandwith will be measured more tightly in the future, which will mean people won't really want to share. just a hunch.

_____________________________

Photoblogging My Life
Post #: 16
RE: What is considered stealing? - 3/9/2010 10:06:47 AM   
NotreDame

 

Posts: 466
Joined: 4/14/2009
From: 5 hours south of the Golden Dome of Notre Dame
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: FunBetty

Yes, it still "exists", but if you are using someone's wifi, you are slowing down their connection speed (and they may potentially be charged for using extra bandwidth).


Hmmm....the connection speed is not necessarily "slowed" by the use of wifi by another individual. Furthermore, the "slowing down the connection speed" may not be something which is "taken." The wifi is still there, the connection speed is likely unaffected or the adverse affect on connection speed is de minimis, and in such a scenario stealing is non-existent.

According to your reasoning, a slowing in the connection speed and or the individual having being charged for using extra bandwith constitutes as stealing. So the person who uses someone else's wifi, without their permission, is not stealing when their use does not slow connectivity and/or the individual is not charged for use of extra bandwith. Does this line drawing make sense to you?

_____________________________

I cannot undertake to lay my finger on that article of the Constitution which granted a right to Congress of expending, on objects of benevolence, the money of their constituents.
James Madison, Father of the U.S. Constitution.
Post #: 17
RE: What is considered stealing? - 3/9/2010 10:11:55 AM   
FunBetty


Posts: 4997
Joined: 4/11/2005
From: Land o Cheesecake and Pizza
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: NotreDame

quote:

ORIGINAL: FunBetty

Yes, it still "exists", but if you are using someone's wifi, you are slowing down their connection speed (and they may potentially be charged for using extra bandwidth).


Hmmm....the connection speed is not necessarily "slowed" by the use of wifi by another individual. Furthermore, the "slowing down the connection speed" may not be something which is "taken." The wifi is still there, the connection speed is likely unaffected or the adverse affect on connection speed is de minimis, and in such a scenario stealing is non-existent.

According to your reasoning, a slowing in the connection speed and or the individual having being charged for using extra bandwith constitutes as stealing. So the person who uses someone else's wifi, without their permission, is not stealing when their use does not slow connectivity and/or the individual is not charged for use of extra bandwith. Does this line drawing make sense to you?


I never said it was okay to steal wifi if it wouldn't affect the other person. I stated the above as possible consequences of stealing. Whether someone only checks their e-mail once a week or streams videos all day long, they are still using a service that they are not paying for.

So, yes. My line drawing DOES make sense.

_____________________________

My PFY
Post #: 18
RE: What is considered stealing? - 3/9/2010 10:22:18 AM   
NotreDame

 

Posts: 466
Joined: 4/14/2009
From: 5 hours south of the Golden Dome of Notre Dame
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: FunBetty

quote:

ORIGINAL: NotreDame

quote:

ORIGINAL: FunBetty

Yes, it still "exists", but if you are using someone's wifi, you are slowing down their connection speed (and they may potentially be charged for using extra bandwidth).


Hmmm....the connection speed is not necessarily "slowed" by the use of wifi by another individual. Furthermore, the "slowing down the connection speed" may not be something which is "taken." The wifi is still there, the connection speed is likely unaffected or the adverse affect on connection speed is de minimis, and in such a scenario stealing is non-existent.

According to your reasoning, a slowing in the connection speed and or the individual having being charged for using extra bandwith constitutes as stealing. So the person who uses someone else's wifi, without their permission, is not stealing when their use does not slow connectivity and/or the individual is not charged for use of extra bandwith. Does this line drawing make sense to you?


I never said it was okay to steal wifi if it wouldn't affect the other person. I stated the above as possible consequences of stealing. Whether someone only checks their e-mail once a week or streams videos all day long, they are still using a service that they are not paying for.

So, yes. My line drawing DOES make sense.


What is being "taken"? The wifi still exists, as you previously admitted, so what is being taken? Your argument is tantamount to the following. "He stole (taken) my automobile and while he stole it from me, I was simultaneously capable of using it." Well, if the automobile was stolen, i.e. taken from the individual, then they no longer have it in their possession, for their use, for the period of time in which it was stolen.

What is being taken away from the individual here in the case of wifi? Second, if you were listing the possible consequences of the theft, as opposed to drawing lines delineating when stealing exists and does not, then there is no line drawing, which necessarily renders as moot and void your remark the line drawing makes sense. Line drawing cannot make sense when and where line drawing is non-existent.

_____________________________

I cannot undertake to lay my finger on that article of the Constitution which granted a right to Congress of expending, on objects of benevolence, the money of their constituents.
James Madison, Father of the U.S. Constitution.
Post #: 19
RE: What is considered stealing? - 3/9/2010 10:26:28 AM   
FunBetty


Posts: 4997
Joined: 4/11/2005
From: Land o Cheesecake and Pizza
Status: offline
Dictionary.com - Steal

quote:

steal   /stil/ Show Spelled [steel] Show IPA ,verb,stole, sto·len, steal·ing, noun
–verb (used with object)
1.to take (the property of another or others) without permission or right, esp. secretly or by force: A pickpocket stole his watch.


If you are using something without permission or right, that is taking.

I'm sorry if that is not clear enough for you to understand.

_____________________________

My PFY
Post #: 20
RE: What is considered stealing? - 3/9/2010 10:26:47 AM   
iwillfearnoevil


Posts: 1562
Joined: 11/6/2007
From: upstate NY
Status: offline
ummm i'm pretty sure the line is drawn with the government and internet company. funny how you are arguining over people's opinions instead of the laws and terms of service (legal agreements)

_____________________________

Photoblogging My Life
Post #: 21
RE: What is considered stealing? - 3/9/2010 12:03:26 PM   
DaveW


Posts: 4123
Joined: 4/12/2005
From: MD suburbs of Washington DC
Status: online
Do you expect my mother in her 70s and not thinking all that clearly any more to figure out how to put a password on her wireless router? And expect her to remember said password?

_____________________________

Avatar is my son Caleb and Leah on their wedding 12/20/09
=======================
Winner of 2010 "best in "He Says"
=======================
Our CD is available here:
http://cdbaby.com/cd/dswaggoner
Post #: 22
RE: What is considered stealing? - 3/9/2010 12:18:26 PM   
Ps103


Posts: 12978
Joined: 4/16/2005
From: Here, now
Status: offline
I think we are looking at the wireless question from the wrong angle.

We are thinking of it in terms of "it is my neighbor's signal and if I latch onto it I am (or am not) suing something that belongs to my neighbor."

But it is not the neighbor's signal, the neighbor is paying to subscribe to it.

You would not be taking anything from the neighbor, but from the ISP.

(Although our old neighbors did ask if we were using their signal . They said someone was draining on theirs and they wanted to know who it was. Turned out a certain member of their family was constantly downloading stuff.)

_____________________________

Fasten your seatbelts...it's going to be a bumpy night.
Post #: 23
RE: What is considered stealing? - 3/9/2010 12:22:17 PM   
FunBetty


Posts: 4997
Joined: 4/11/2005
From: Land o Cheesecake and Pizza
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: Ps103

But it is not the neighbor's signal, the neighbor is paying to subscribe to it.

You would not be taking anything from the neighbor, but from the ISP.



Good point.

_____________________________

My PFY
Post #: 24
RE: What is considered stealing? - 3/9/2010 12:42:42 PM   
NotreDame

 

Posts: 466
Joined: 4/14/2009
From: 5 hours south of the Golden Dome of Notre Dame
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: FunBetty

Dictionary.com - Steal

quote:

steal   /stil/ Show Spelled [steel] Show IPA ,verb,stole, sto·len, steal·ing, noun
–verb (used with object)
1.to take (the property of another or others) without permission or right, esp. secretly or by force: A pickpocket stole his watch.


If you are using something without permission or right, that is taking.

I'm sorry if that is not clear enough for you to understand.


Reading the definition rather closely, it says to take (the property of another or others) without permission or right. The example they gave was of something tanglible, i.e a watch. Since when has wifi constituted as property? Is wifi property? Are you actually asserting wifi is property, like a car, house, wallet, computer, etcetera?

So no, it is not at all clear to me because A.) you conveniently chose to rely on only the portion of the definition which suited your argument while ignoring the "property" component to the definition and B.) the definition you cited refers to "property" and does anybody know if wifi constitutes as "property"?

_____________________________

I cannot undertake to lay my finger on that article of the Constitution which granted a right to Congress of expending, on objects of benevolence, the money of their constituents.
James Madison, Father of the U.S. Constitution.
Post #: 25
Page:   [1] 2 3   next >   >>
All Forums >> [Theology] >> Morality & Ethics >> What is considered stealing?
Jump to post #:
Page: [1] 2 3   next >   >>
Jump to:





New Messages No New Messages
Hot Topic w/ New Messages Hot Topic w/o New Messages
Locked w/ New Messages Locked w/o New Messages
 Post New Thread
 Reply to Message
 Post New Poll
 Submit Vote
 Delete My Own Post
 Delete My Own Thread
 Rate Posts



  Forum Tools
Forums |  Register |  Login |  My Profile |  Inbox |  Address Book |  My Subscription |  My Forums 

Photo Gallery |  Member List |  Search |  Calendars |  FAQ |  TOS |  Disclaimer |  Ticket List |  Log Out | 

Forum Software © ASPPlayground.NET Advanced Edition 2.5 ANSI